Search for: "White v. United States" Results 4381 - 4400 of 6,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Additionally, Title V (§ 5105) would extend protection against national origin and citizenship status discrimination beyond the acts of hiring and discharge from employment to also include “verification of the individual’s eligibility to work in the United States” or “verification of employment authorization,” and would transfer enforcement jurisdiction over this form of national origin discrimination from the Equal Employment Opportunity… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:51 am
  Following substantial briefing and a lengthy hearing, this Court, reviewing the matter de novo, see United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 4:57 am by Kinga Tibori-Szabó
Transparency is the precursor of accountability, so let us keep the ball rolling.Filed under: National Security, Public International Law Tagged: imminence, International law, self-defense, targeted killings, transparency, united states, White Paper [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which struck down part of a statute that “imposes sentencing enhancements on repeat offenders who commit crimes with guns. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm
The petitions are White & Case LLP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 1:47 pm by Katie Barlow
Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States Amy Coney Barrett took the judicial oath Tuesday morning to become the Supreme Court’s 115th justice, joining the bench at a time when the court is being asked to rule on pressing issues related to next week’s presidential election. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am by Amy Howe
United States — in which the Petitioner is seeking review of a capital court-martial conviction on the ground that the means by which the military imposes the death penalty is unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
“The verdict they handed down is just and speaks the truth,” John White, a Spartanburg-based lawyer representing the state, said in an interview. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
The other decision was State v. [read post]