Search for: "People v. Deem"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
In the second case (Dyson, Case C-321/03), the question was again not answered: since the transparent dust-collecting bin of a Dyson vacuum cleaner was deemed incapable of being a trade mark, acquired distinctiveness ceased to be in issue. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm
At close of business on Tuesday, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 10:28 pm
Meanwhile I've found out about a number of Access Advance v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
. *** Pretrial hearings continue in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm
I suspect the merger of the two will create unexpected headaches for courts, platforms, and even the people the duty of care was supposed to help: individuals or businesses harmed by illegal content online. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Recognizing the year’s worst in government transparency “The Ringer,” the first track on Eminem’s 2018 album, Kamikaze, includes a line that piqued Buzzfeed reporter Jason Leopold’s curiosity: the rapper claimed the Secret Service visited him due to some controversial lyrics about Ivanka Trump. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 8:25 am
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
Retractable Technologies, Incorporated v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Recognizing the year’s worst in government transparency “The Ringer,” the first track on Eminem’s 2018 album, Kamikaze, includes a line that piqued Buzzfeed reporter Jason Leopold’s curiosity: the rapper claimed the Secret Service visited him due to some controversial lyrics about Ivanka Trump. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:47 am
Pa.) in Monge v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
It is crafted to override critical legal rights and safeguards in singling out only those arriving at the border without authorization and deeming that class of people a unique and unmitigable public health threat. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
In recent years, two unfortunate trends have converged in cybersecurity—the growth of child pornography distributed online and the proliferation of encryption systems that enable the distribution of all forms of content (both lawful and illicit) in a manner that is inaccessible to service providers and secure from observation and interception by law enforcement. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) I have been considering the issue of of labor cooperatives as a central element of the reform (though quite limited and preliminary) of the Cuban economic system. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm
All of these developments required people taking cases (that is behaviour) which has not been “ordinarily encountered” in litigation. [read post]
