Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 6,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United… [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court is regularly subjected to such arguments, especially from amici (including foreign government amici). [read post]
12 Oct 2024, 4:45 am
” However, the AEA’s only limiting language is found in the triggering language for those powers: “Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event…” … [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
This is an old battle and one that is hardly confined to the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm
In England, former United Kingdom Supreme Court Judges like Lord Collins and Lord Mance are renowned for their expertise in conflict of laws. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
But the other two patents are being challenged before the Federal Patent Court of Germany (Bundespatentgericht), which is even stricter than the EPO.Some other German Qualcomm v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
Every such filing serves a purpose, even the one that George Soros funded--as the latter makes, apart from some far-fetched theories and overregulatory ideology, a number of surprisingly reasonable points (like a limited dose of a poisonous substance potentially serving a medical purpose) and may appeal to any ultraliberal(s) on the panel (a political inclination the Ninth Circuit has a reputation for, though President Trump--the most profilic nominator of federal judges in history--has already… [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Dabiri v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
" And here's what happens when a Member of Congress tries to make a deal with the United States or its agencies, as per 18 USCS § 431: Whoever, being a Member of or Delegate to Congress, or a Resident Commissioner, either before or after he has qualified, directly or indirectly, himself, or by any other person in trust for him, or for his use or benefit, or on his account, undertakes, executes, holds, or enjoys, in whole or in part, any contract or… [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
I remember her as a witness who came across as trustworthy, knowledgeable, and fairly balanced in the FTC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
In 1989, with torches and pitchforks, Congress chased the Tariff Schedule of the United States away from our black and white villages, never to be seen again. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:05 am
Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
The Court had not been interpreting the Constitution to require states to create political units that weighed votes equally. [read post]
