Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 61,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 11:04 am
In the other case, U.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 5:53 am
DeStefano case decided earlier this year by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:24 am
In Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:07 pm
Ringgold's conduct in state court. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:13 pm
What does “inextricably intertwined” mean? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:56 pm
Georgia ruled that that language means what it says. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:13 am
State, 2011 Ala. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
(b)(1) ["[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of 'course of conduct'"]; see Thomas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:54 pm
Counsel responded that the statute didn't mean much for the meaning of an FOIA passed 27 years earlier. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 3:37 pm
” The states’ brief in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
But the identification fo trajectories and the evaluation of their consequences--the way we invest them with meaning and value, add important dimensions to the legal and policy discussions that are now taking place. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:42 am
Such was the case with The Marketing Store Worldwide v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 9:37 am
The Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:05 am
This appeal considered whether, when a confiscation order is made under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994, the words ‘the said sum… as was due at the time of the period of detention was imposed’ in the Magistrates’ Court Act 1980, s 79(2) mean the sum due when the default term was fixed by the Crown Court judge or the sum due when the default term was activated by the Magistrates’ Court. [read post]
3 May 2008, 8:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
