Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 12,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
7 May 2007, 6:17 am
Louis, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
The Court of Appeal agreed that this state law pre-empted the City's attempt to regulate the initial rents of newly-constructed units. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:00 am
Interestingly, the EU doesn’t mention the United States, which is arguably the most significant country yet to implement an effective site-blocking regime. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:51 am
On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court for the first time recognized the so-called “ministerial exception” to workplace discrimination laws. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 11:27 am
United States, Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:40 pm
Section 175 of the Housing Act 1996, which defines homelessness duties states (1 )A person is homeless if he has no accommodation available for his occupation, in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, which he— (a) is entitled to occupy by virtue of an interest in it or by virtue of an order of a court, So basically a tenant can continue to occupy property until a court finally orders them to leave. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
In Lexmark v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am
As the DOJ’s complaint quotes an email from a property owner: I also rely on comparing available units to adj[usted] leases needed, to forecast leases, to gut check the pricing recs. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Last month, in Byrd v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:00 am
United States, are at risk of quiet abrogation by the operation of predictive analytics. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:14 pm
United States — Retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
But Rule 83.3(c)(3) makes special provisions for attorneys for the United States (e.g., the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
