Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 6,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
You can read Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII.] [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Title: Robinson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Pogowasright notes the development of the CLOUD Act, a bipartisan bill proposing the regulation of cross-border data access. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
Looking to both the medium and long-term future of this important framework, there are two big areas which I argue this review should seek to reform: firstly, the GDPR’s overly acontextual and process-based norms and, secondly, its often ineffective implementation and enforcement including in many cross-border cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:24 am
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Miami Field Division; John V. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:42 am
For copies of the Bell and CWTA consent agreements, see: Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:01 am
For example, he notes that in the spring of 1918, every conceivable Habsburg war aim had been met: …[with their] borders not only secure but all the countries beyond them prostrate. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
Purcell Jr., Some Horwitzian Themes in the Law and History of the Federal Courts 17 Barbara Aronstein Black, Some Contract History: About Samuel Williston 18 Constance Backhouse, Anti-Semitism and the Law in Québec City: The Plamondon Case, 1910-15 19 Katherine V. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:26 am
In Shea v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:44 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
In considering whether the case should be transferred in the interest of justice, the court considers whether (i) transfer would promote economic and efficient administration of the bankruptcy estate, (ii) the interests of judicial economy would be served by the transfer, (iii) the parties would be able to receive a fair trial in each of the possible venues, (iv) either forum has an interest in having the controversy decided within its borders, (v) the enforceability of any… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
* Brenda V. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
According to the Informal Opinion, “Contiguous” as used in Public Officers Law §3.2 means “sharing a border” or “touching. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
The IPKat is grateful to his readers for providing him with further information on the reference to the European Court of Justice by the Cour de Cassation, France, of Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (noted by a very tired Kat at the end of a long day here). [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
No, advised the Attorney General.According to the Informal Opinion, "Contiguous" as used in Public Officers Law §3.2 means "sharing a border" or "touching. [read post]
