Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 93,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 4:45 am
Here: Klamath Irrigation District Cert Petition.pdfDownload Question presented: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am
The privilege does apply to causes of action other than defamation, but it does not apply to malpractice or malicious prosecution (Hadar v Pierce, 111 AD3d 439,440 [1 st Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
Issue 6: Does the Asylum Procedures Directive continue to have effect as retained EU law? [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 6:12 am
In Dashti v Long, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2024 WL 4614387 (United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Just last year, in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 9:08 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm
The contract may state that a party will do something (the primary event) and then stipulate a further event if the primary event does not occur (the secondary obligation). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Even in AT & T v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:02 am
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:11 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Bilski v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
In applying the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, it held that an sovereign's immunity waiver for a specific forum abroad does not extend to a U.S. court. The court examined an implied-waiver exception and a commercial-activity exception. Generally, a foreign state is not immune from suit when it has waived such immunity or the suit is based on certain forms of commercial activity. The court based its decision on Creighton Ltd.… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Supreme Court, however, Trump does not press the “under the United States” Positions Clause argument. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
See Perez v. [read post]
