Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 12,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 11:08 pm
While the state law, Penal Law § 400.00, is not explicitly preemptive, the Appellate Division found implicit field preemption because: 1. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
Via Corporate Law Report- Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Supports Hydropower Industry and Private Landowners (K&L Gates LLP)“The United States Supreme Court gave the hydropower industry a major victory last week in the closely watched case of PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
(Mass.) 1999); Kim v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
Indiana, 452 U.S. 314, 329 n.17 (1981); United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:12 am
S.H. and Others v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm
V. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:53 am
” Katz v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
State Comp. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:32 am
One recent case, Strine v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:05 am
The Third Circuit also concluded that Section 1098g did not impliedly conflict with the PA AG’s state law claims or preempt the field of regulation of student loans. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:51 am
Summary of Decision issued December 31, 2008Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Walters v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Fielding, 289 S.W.3d 844, 848 (Tex. 2009). [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), and "levels the playing field" between local and out-of-state retailers. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
In 1993, this practice led to the Utah Supreme Court ruling in East Jordan Irrigation Company v Morgan, commonly known as "the East Jordan Case." [read post]
