Search for: "Harris, Appeal of" Results 4461 - 4480 of 5,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Certiorari -- No basis for certiorari review regarding grant of motion for protective order as to interrogatories and order declaring plaintiff a “vexatious litigant” -- Jurisdiction -- Appeal of dismissal for failure to state a cause of action with leave for plaintiff to amend is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the dismissal is a non-final orderPATRICK NEPTUNE, Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, likely will be picking some lucky lawyer to defend the judgment below. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
On Appeal from the 190th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2013-04227A. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Jeff Welty
[concerning] memory variables affecting eyewitness identification”; the trial judge ruled that the evidence was “not of sufficient probative value and would serve only to confuse the jury,” especially given that the witness had not interviewed the victim who made the identification; the court of appeals affirmed, noting that the proposed testimony was general in nature and that the witness did not apply the “memory variables” to “the facts of this… [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 8:05 am
"Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun aptly described this endless activity as "tinker[ing] with the machinery of death. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, by a 2-1 vote, held that conclusion was not unreasonable. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Jeff Welty
[concerning] memory variables affecting eyewitness identification”; the trial judge ruled that the evidence was “not of sufficient probative value and would serve only to confuse the jury,” especially given that the witness had not interviewed the victim who made the identification; the court of appeals affirmed, noting that the proposed testimony was general in nature and that the witness did not apply the “memory variables” to “the facts of this… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Harry, 816 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir. 2016) (ruling against Indian sexual assault defendant) Sanders v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 4:33 am by INFORRM
TikTok has stated its intention to appeal the decision in full. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am by Steve Hall
But the now more-conservative court rejected without comment a last-ditch appeal by Wilson's lawyers. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 24 June 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism. [read post]