Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 4461 - 4480
of 13,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
See, e.g., BASF Agro B.V. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm
Instead, with a re-weighing, NYU slid only to 9, and Cornell to 14. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm
Instead, with a re-weighing, NYU slid only to 9, and Cornell to 14. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
(See e.g. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 9:27 am
Like others (see, e.g., here, here, here), Mr. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Res. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:43 am
But I wanted to focus on one of the most popular critiques, then move to gaming out how citations might look in a rankings system.Many have noted how Hein might undercount individual faculty citations, either accidentally (e.g., misspellings of names) or intentionally (e.g., exclusion of many peer-reviewed journals from their database), along with intentional exclusion of certain faculty (e.g., excluding a very highly-cited legal research & writing faculty member who… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 7:30 am
Where international organizations once served the community of states, they now serve as vessels that contain mass interests re-incarnated as representative organizations that produce or negotiate formal law and societal norms for self-application. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
That is not the issue when we're considering the relationship between inequality and growth. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
When daughters are punching mothers in the face, we're not in a good place.After hitting her mother, Jenny bolts from the family home, and Amy calls the police to find her. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
I appreciate the replicability issue, but the larger q is whether we’re running experiments for the same purposes, or what the import is for the discipline in which we’re working. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
E.g., Budding v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:30 pm
" Then drops a citation to make crystal clear what the panel's talking about: "See, e.g., Busby v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
(…) And even though the Government will generally need a warrant to access CSLI, case-specific exceptions—e.g., exigent circumstances—may support a warrantless search. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:04 pm
" And, of course, the speech restrictions are overtly viewpoint-based: If you express pro-equality viewpoints, you're fine; if you express the contrary viewpoints, you're risking disciplinary action. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
In re Deuel, 51 F.3d 1552, 1557 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 9:27 am
Potential normative justifications—e.g., deliberation is great; it’s its own justification. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Do I need to re-apply? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
As no response was received, the request for re-establishment was refused on October 30, 2009. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 1:58 pm
How often do they re-audit that they are in compliance with these standards? [read post]
