Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
SCOTUS has not decided this question, preferring to resolve the issue on statutory grounds in Department of Commerce v House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999). [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
State of Haryana and another [(2003) 4 SCC 675], Nikhil Merchant v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
This column will develop these two perspectives.Easier to DefendSince the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm
Texas is one of the states that has felt the biggest impact of the population shifts that showed up in the new Census. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 5:21 am
That the applicant never said he felt depressed? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am
The POAU fought against what they felt was a sinister encroachment of the Roman Catholic Church into public schools and their claims for federal funding during the Protestant-Catholic wars in the 50s and 60s. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:44 am
Reading the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:01 am
See Arrow Productions Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:08 pm
They felt bound to follow Mackin—a 2002 decision where the Supreme Court said legislators are mostly (but not completely) immune from liability. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:08 pm
They felt bound to follow Mackin—a 2002 decision where the Supreme Court said legislators are mostly (but not completely) immune from liability. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
I could not detect from the Book whether the author, in the end, felt any sympathy for Hayes. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:29 pm
For example, Judge Berzon felt that a different result would occur if an internet advertisement, such as in Storus, clearly stated that the ad is not for the trademark owner’s product. [read post]
