Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 10,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2020, 4:00 am
The court held that Employee failed to demonstrate that the arbitration award violated this standard, "or that any other grounds for vacatur stated in CPLR 7511(b) apply. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:17 pm
Supreme Court dealt another body blow to the Fourth Amendment in Navarette v California . [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
”Since J.C. wasn't able to rebut the franchisors’ showing that they “lacked the requisite control over the manner in which Plaza Toyota serviced vehicles,” the AD2 thought the denial of the dismissal motion was an error and reversed; dismissing all claims and cross-claims that had been asserted against those defendants.Interestingly, the failure to introduce a copy of the dealership agreement didn’t negate the franchisors’ entitlement to relief, nor did their… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has ruled in the case of Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:02 pm
Supreme Court case of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:40 pm
In reaching it conclusion, the court in Young v. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:16 am
Today's post is authored by David Depaolo and shared from http://daviddepaolo.blogspot.com .It's the long arm of the law.When the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed into law conservatives applauded that it would open up the forces of economic powers from Mexico that were previously running underground.Liberals said that NAFTA spelled the end of domestic work for Americans.Of course, neither of the extreme views became reality.What did become reality, however, is that Mexican… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:36 am
The case is Young v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:59 pm
Plaintiff Candido Romo was sitting in the driver seat of his parked car, when he was approached by officer Jeff Largen. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:17 pm
WHO:EFF Surveillance Litigation Director Jennifer LynchWHAT:California v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Thomas v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
According to Mercer v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:36 am
It states that women may see their motor premiums rise, but may also benefit from receiving higher payments when purchasing retirement income products. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
The reason for this is that a criminal defendant has an absolute right to remain silent pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 7:50 pm
Goodwin v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:00 am
The court held that Employee failed to demonstrate that the arbitration award violated this standard, "or that any other grounds for vacatur stated in CPLR 7511(b) apply. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm
A shift toward direct regulation of GHG emissions occurred following the 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:14 pm
Washington State’s “safely off the roadway” defense, codified in RCW 46.61.504, would seem to implictly include these factors. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:26 am
The Sixth Circuit recently ruled in Phelps v. [read post]
