Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 4501 - 4520 of 11,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am by Dan Farber
That matters, and not only because we may be more despondent than the facts justify. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 10:18 am by Craig Foster
Wang specializes in managing patent matters in a variety of technical areas including automotive and automation, wireless technologies and IoT, Telecommunication, and more. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:51 am
The decisions on this topic divide into two streams at the Superior Court of Justice level, and there does not appear to be a Court of Appeal decision settling the matter. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:23 am
Graber dissents, joined by Pregerson, Thomas, Paez, arguing that the Jewell instruction as a matter of statutory construction is not proper because it misleads and misconstrues the mens rea in 21 USC 841. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:18 am
"' A companion article has more on the ruling by Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones: "In the light of the long history of the common law and democracy which we share with the United States it was in our view difficult to conceive that a democratically elected and accountable government could possibly have any rational objection to placing into the public domain such a summary of what its own officials reported, as to how a detainee was treated by them and… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
Mensing, a four-Justice plurality (Thomas, J., joined by Roberts, C.J., Scalia, Alito, JJ.) concluded that the presumption should no longer apply in conflict preemption cases like this one. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
A jurisdictional rule cannot be used as a device to undermine federal law, no matter how evenhanded it may appear; and3. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:14 pm by rreeves
The Reeves Law Group is not acting as legal counsel for any party in the matters discussed in this posting. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:31 pm
He ended by toasting all of them, Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Kennedy: "Our homeys in robes: much love, much props, peace out. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:19 am
(See "Plaintiff Thinking Can Grow You Bottom Line" by Thomas L. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:20 pm
Some justices think the Fourteenth Amendment protects newer unenumerated rights as well, but all the justices including Scalia and Thomas agree that it protects unenumerated rights that are deeply rooted in history and tradition. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by Robert Siegel
Brook’s attorney, Thomas Fehn, has publicly stated his objection to the judgment and said he plans to ask for reconsideration. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:21 pm by Marc DeGirolami
As a matter of description, that seems to me the most accurate way of understanding things. [read post]