Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 4521 - 4540 of 6,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
Also a strong plurality to majority of the public supports "civil unions" and "equal benefits. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and downtown Chicago, our Glen Ellyn and Hinsdale non-compete agreement and business dispute lawyers take cases from Highland Park and Northbrook and many other cities throughout Illinois, as well as in Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
The majority’s misinterpretation of the exemption renders the statute in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am by Rory Little
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm by Florian Mueller
"The real-world evidence included, among other things, license deals such as the Apple-HTC settlement and Apple's own 60-cents-per-unit damages claim in the "Posner case" (Apple v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:10 pm by The Regulatory Review
Suicide is the tenth leading cause of death in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Car market v. moral relations—treating people as other humans rather than anthropological units. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:09 am by Scott Dodson
When the United States is not a party, the solicitor general does occasionally file amicus briefs on behalf of the United States in cases involving rule interpretation. [read post]