Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 93,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
On Monday, a New Jersey State Appeals Court decided State v Gaitan. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:10 am
In Crymes v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 4:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
In the Arizona Supreme Court's Vazquez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
Judge Price, writing for six-judge majority, explained that a defendant does not have to make a prima facie case in his affidavit, but he does need to allege facts that show reasonable grounds to believe that he could have prevailed under both of Strickland's prongs. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:02 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 6:08 am
US v Kelly, 9th Cir. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
Network, LLC v New York State Thruway Auth., 181 AD3d at 1074). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
Network, LLC v New York State Thruway Auth., 181 AD3d at 1074). [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 8:54 pm
For example, in Reliance Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:43 pm
How many cases will yesterday's decision in Hall v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
The style of the case is, Home Service Casualty Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
In which a guy in Nevada in 2009 gets deported, but a guy in Nevada in 2013 who does the exact same thing does not, and a guy in (say) Kansas in either year stays as well. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:34 am
Co., 448 F.3d 416, 420-25 (D.C.Cir.2006) (concluding, in the context of an appeal under Rule 23(f), that the FLSA does not necessarily preclude an exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over related state-law claims); De Asencio v. [read post]
A grant of summary judgment without more does not support a finding of bad faith by the losing party
26 Nov 2011, 10:11 am
Ferolito v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:44 am
Irving v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
The statute does not target the out-of-state vendor’s sales through agents who are not New York residents. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
The statute does not target the out-of-state vendor’s sales through agents who are not New York residents. [read post]
