Search for: "Hand v. State" Results 4561 - 4580 of 30,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Sir David Eady handed down his last trial judgment last week, AXB x BXA [2018] EWHC 588 (QB) , The case concerned an extra-marital relationship between a man of considerable wealth and his “mistress” which took place between July 2014 and August 2016. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
Defendant moved his hands toward the victim's pants; she attempted to push his hands away. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:06 pm
  If we really had a rule that treated seriously the Ninth Circuit's principle about trees (or receipts) falling in the forest where no one hears (or steals) them, I think we might well have to strike down a plethora of federal and state statutes that we're super happy with and that we commonly think reflect legitimate interests. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:46 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 11:45 am by John Hochfelder
A more relevant analysis of prior cases would have included the following (all reviewed in our post on hand injury cases here): Fang v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by Tristan Marot
The Free State High Court confirms in J.H.V v Centlec (SOC) Ltd and Others that an acknowledgement of liability by the debtor interrupts prescription, even if the acknowledgement is not made directly to the creditor. [read post]