Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 441 - 460
of 571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
.'" Applying what Akhil Amar has called "intra-textualism," we might therefore think that while only "persons" are entitled by the Fourteenth Amendment to due process and equal protection, slavery is forbidden for all beings capable of being enslaved. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:08 am
We can then follow Akhil Amar's contention that Article V applies to governmental initiated constitutional change and does not prevent the sovereign authority of the people from adopting a more majoritarian process. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
Justice Kennedy spoke at the Aspen Institute about the Constitution and the Court, in an event moderated by Akhil Amar and Elliot Gerson. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:50 am
All good brief writers know to quote "surprising" support for their views, along with more predictable citations.What cuts against the "causal" hypothesis is that no judge identified as "liberal" has, to my knowledge, announced a change of mind following reading anything that Amar or I, or especially Tribe, by far the most important of all of us, has written. 2) The Second Amendment is a wonderful example of the tension between "static" and… [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:30 pm
Or if an embattled President were to step down to devote his attention to defending himself against impeachment as Akhil Amar recommended for President Clinton, would that empower the V.P. and Cabinet force him out of power under §4 next time around? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am
Other scholars such as Akhil Amar have made similar arguments. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:20 pm
He uses a technique that Akhil Amar has called "intra-textualism" to glean the meaning of a term--"Office"--from how it and other terms are used in other parts of the document. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:54 am
As Akhil Amar and others have been protesting for years, the existence of the Fourth Amendment violation requires no prosecution, and the ability to obtain a remedy for such a violation should not turn at all on whether a prosecution is attempted or results in a conviction. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
Liptak pointed to Yale Law Professor Akhil Reed Amar who holds the opinion that the Constitution “implicitly immunize[s] a sitting president from ordinary criminal prosecution. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 5:13 pm
This got some attention back in 2008 when theNew York Times first posted on it and then ran commentary by a number of distinguished law professors -- like Pam Karlen, Akhil Amar, and Randy Barnett. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Many scholars believe that Clause was drafted with an eye towards protecting economic liberty in particular, but it was (in the words of Akhil Amar) “strangled in its crib” by the Slaughter‐House Cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:46 am
It is true, incidentally, that Akhil and Vikram Amar have written a wonderful article plausibly arguing that the Succession in Office Act is unconstitutional, and I believe that it is perhaps even worse than unconstitutional, i.e., monumentally stupid. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar have put forward an Intermediate View: the elected President is an "officer of the United States," but members of Congress are not. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
(On this point Amar's book on the Bill of Rights is quite important.). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
I wrote an amicus brief in this case with Yale Sterling Professor of Law, Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram D. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
In fact, despite the many and passionate debates over federal power that occurred in the first century and a half of the Constitution, no one suggested that Resolution VI had any relevance at all prior to 1935 when Robert Stern first made the argument in the Harvard Law Review.The use of Resolution VI as an interpretive guide then disappeared once more until surfacing briefly in a footnote by Professor Akhil Amar in his 2005 book, America’s Constitution: A Biography. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
In fact, some of these legal experts recommend a single term of 18 years for Supreme Court Justices, including Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar writing in Should U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:02 am
” In 1998, Yale scholar Akhil Reed Amar also referenced Story’s remarks in Senate testimony that later appeared in a law-review article. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution (1/27/24). [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Amar sees the transformed Establishment reading, too, as a legacy of former federal territories; upon becoming states, they were inclined to bind themselves to the same antiestablishment language found in the national Constitution.[14]Changes in federal Indian policy were also influenced by this shifting sentiment. [read post]
