Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 4,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by The Book Review Editor
It was this failure of communication and rigid application of the information “wall” that allowed Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi to pass into the United States unhindered and unnoticed; they were both on American Airlines Flight 77 which crashed into the Pentagon. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Skilling v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:32 pm
United States, the United States Sentencing Commission voted unanimously to retroactively apply a recent amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines that reduces the penalty for crack cocaine offenses. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Similarly, there are no territorial limits on the federal government's jurisdiction within the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:06 am by Steven Cohen
J S HELWIG & SON LLC et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Georgia – March 24th, 2024) involves a hit-and-run motor vehicle accident. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:31 pm by Jon Sands
The plea agreement stated that the defendant agreed to waive "[a]ny right conferred by Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 to appeal the sentence. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 10:46 am by Alexis
– Alexis The post Useful Info During COVID (v. 5) appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Orin Kerr
In his vigorous dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
Sanford, which held that blacks -- whether slave or free -- were not citizens of the United States and therefore were not entitled to assert rights in US courts. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 10:19 pm by hlpronline
United States, an important case dealing with freedom of speech in the context of social media. [read post]