Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 441 - 460
of 34,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2007, 12:55 pm
Paul was entitled under Buss v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 6:05 am
Hart v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 7:29 am
Holding that the answer to this question is no, the appeals court pointed out that when plaintiffs allege discrimination in violation of USERRA, courts apply a two-step burden-shifting framework adapted from NLRB v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:16 pm
In this case, Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:16 pm
In this case, Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:19 am
Ferolito v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 4:13 pm
On October 4, 2019, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in June Medical Services v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:43 am
The burden of proof then shifted to the defendant owners/operators of the aircraft to produce an explanation which was consistent with [...] [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Today the Supreme Court issued a unanimous (8-0) decision in Tanzin v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:41 am
I haven't had time to read it, but Paroline v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:30 am
George v Eagle Air Services Ltd and Others Privy Council “The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself, applied in a claim for damages arising out of an allegation of negligence causing an air crash, so that the burden of proof shifted to the defendant owners and operators of the aircraft to produce an [...] [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:48 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
Ransom v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:32 am
He responds in his post When Keynesians Attack, Part II: In my original post (the one he was attacking), I commented on the “burden of government” rather than the “burden of government spending. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:16 am
Carr v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
In the Stussy case, Case C-244/00 Van Doren + Q GmbH v Lifestyle + Sportswear Handelsgesellschaft mbH [2003] ETMR 75, 8 April 2003, the European Court of Justice was faced with a tricky problem involving burden of proof of consent to the marketing of goods where the trade mark owner said they hadn't been put on the market in the EEA by the trade mark owner or with its consent, while a retailer of the allegedly infringing goods said they had. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:49 am
V. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA) (S. 2189) introduced by Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) would explicitly reject the June 18, 2009 Supreme Court decision in Gross v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 10:22 pm
Lott, Jr. v. [read post]
