Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 441 - 460 of 3,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
[The underlying rationale was to encourage the rights holder to make use of TPMs and “thereby voluntarily contribute to the proper application of the private copying exception” ([72]) – although whether this is practicable at a commercial level is an entirely separate matter...]Rights holder’s consent for private copying uses (Question 1(a)-(b); Ruling 5)Q. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Cristina Mariottini
Marco Buzzoni, Doctoral Researcher at the Luxembourg Centre for European Law (LCEL) and PhD candidate at the Sorbonne Law School, offers a critical analysis of some recent rulings by the Court of Justice of the European Union in matters of data protection. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am by Jeroen Willekens
As a matter of fact, the Enlarged Board has analysed and endorsed the established jurisprudence in point 26 of the reasons for the decision:"... [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am by SHG
Based on the 92-page decision by District of Columbia Judge Emmett G. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
It is established case law that claimed subject-matter is not excluded from patentability as a non-invention under Article 52(2) EPC for the sole reason that it contains features which might be considered to be non-technical (see opinion G 3/08, OJ EPO 2011, 10, point 10.13 of the Reasons, and decision T 1658/06 of 14 January 2011, point 3 of the Reasons). [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:07 am by Jamie Markham
(There is a space to schedule such a review on form AOC-CR-619A/B/C, the form used to place the person on G.S. 90-96 probation at the outset.) [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:48 am by Mark Wieczorek
Below, the (A)(1)(a) section says that if the officer believes you are under the influence of alcohol he can charge you with a DUI no matter what level of alcohol is in your system. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Russell Jackson
  Plaintiff is one of some 23,000 veterans who were potentially exposed to HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and other bloodborne viral pathogens when they underwent diagnostic procedures and biopsies at VA hospitals using a rectal probe made by the defendants. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:49 am by Xandra Kramer
These include whether or not the ECHR can in fact be at all applicable to such private international law matters and the relationship between the public policy exception and the ECHR. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:44 am by Gregory Forman
  The remaining Comments have been renumbered; Rule 7.2(c)(2), and new Comment [8] to Rule 7.2, are amended to require that the legal service plan or not-for-profit lawyer referral service not be acting in violation of any Rules of Professional Conduct; Rule 7.2(f) is deleted and sections (g), (h), and (i) of the rule are re-designated as sections (f), (g), and (h); New Comment [6] to Rule 7.2 is amended to state that it is the responsibility of the lawyer who… [read post]