Search for: "COPE v. COPE"
Results 441 - 460
of 922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm
Roe 58 v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:08 pm
The first of the mitigating factors raised by Mr Clayton was his consumption of the drug to assist him to cope with work-related stress and to sleep.[6] Whilst this factor was relevant, it had to be assessed in the context of Coles’ drug and alcohol policy, which encouraged self-reporting without sanction.[7] Commissioner Hampton did warn that:[8] There are potential dangers for an employer in providing information about detection periods to the extent that this information might… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:35 am
While Terry v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:18 pm
Smith in Edmondson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
During its upcoming term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Regulatory language has yet to be published, leaving a lot of uncertainties, particularly for small businesses as the country is still coping with the massive impact of COVID-19. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
by Dennis Crouch CenTrak v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:26 pm
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued its decision in the Perfect 10 v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Since then, there is this example of critically important mobile phone tower tracking evidence that was the basis of a conviction for second degree murder at a first trial, later found to be faulty before the re-trial: R. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 am
Supreme Court threaded the needle in its 8-0 decision in AEP v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
The controversial decision of the SCC in Google Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
After all, Atlas Roofing Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
Copes, 290 Kan. 209, 224 P.3d 571 (2010). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
Friday’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:43 pm
In Perdomo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Take for instance the "Anywayup Cup" case, Haberman v Jackel International [1999] FSR 683. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:30 am
I always screw that up.)BTW, I have it on very good authority that Tallahassee -- as usual -- messed things up and caused a technical problem which resulted in the delay of our weekly breath of fresh judicial air.So let's get right to deeply inhaling this week's gusts of juridical joy:North Pointe v. [read post]
