Search for: "Day v. Nelson" Results 441 - 460 of 732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by John Jascob
Meanwhile, Robinhood was hit with a class action complaint in the Southern District of New York for allegedly using the GameStop trading halt to manipulate the market on behalf of hedge funds (Nelson. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 12:01 pm by Unknown
Nelson, J.D.The SEC has formally announced via letter filed with a judge in the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Second, with respect to the Caremark claim, the more recent exposition of Caremark in Stone v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by William Ford
Corker, Kaine, Flake, Coons, Young, and Nelson introduced. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products, Inc.… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
The other day we put up a piece about a Twombly/Iqbal law review symposium that promised “diverse interpretations. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:56 am by Unknown
According to the rulemaking petition, the soon-to-be-argued Supreme Court case Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]