Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm by Unknown
Commission on Civil Rights, Oct. 2019) [text]- See also related press release in English and Spanish.Voices of the Banned: The Trump Administration’s Exclusion of Muslims Seeking Refuge (Refugees International, Oct. 2019) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (29 Oct. 2019)Tagged Publications. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am by Amy Howe
When the Court issued yesterday’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:11 am by Lisa McElroy
For example, let’s start off with Milner v. [read post]
Belhaj & Anor v Straw & Ors; Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence & Anor The Supreme Court heard the appeals in these cases between 9-12 November 2015, considering, among other things, whether the claims of the respondent were barred by operation of either the foreign act of state doctrine or by state immunity. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:38 am
The latest development is the English Commercial Court decision, West Tankers Inc v. (1) Allianz SpA and (2) Generali Assicurazione Generali SpA [2011] EWHC 829 (Comm). [read post]
21 Jan 2003, 5:43 pm
The transcripts are in French and English, but no translation of non-English segments is as yet provided. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
He stated that: "To the mind of the English lawyer ... such a marriage is perceived as exploitative and indeed abusive. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
In his leading judgment Lord Justice Thorpe stated:"I would unhesitatingly conclude that the Marbella court was the more appropriate court having regard to the best interests of the children. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam and Sherifa Hadi
We have spoken about whether an employee can take back their intention to retire in a previous blog post regarding the Ontario Superior Court decision in English v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Beyond Retro usethe "V" word too ...The Opposition Division generously upheld the opposition for goods in Classes 18 and 25, but rejected it for the goods in Class 14. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm by INFORRM
It was coincidental that the cricket libel case, Cairns v Modi and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]