Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
Unfortunately, the judgment is not yet available in English. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:53 pm
The actions of the defendant will only constitute a refusal only if he was warned against it as stated in White v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
In today’s case of the day, Myrtle v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am
Giving judgment striking out the Claimant’s privacy claim in Pryor v Liverpool Womens’ NHS Foundation Trust & Lumsden ([2021] EWHC 2911 (QB) [pdf]), Senior Master Fontaine, has confirmed that the English law of privacy has not progressed yet to there being a stand-alone tort of privacy. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:04 am
(British Telecom & TalkTalk) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.In the Scarlet case, the Advocate General issued an opinion against a Belgian court order requiring an ISP to block and filter material which is in breach of copyright. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:08 am
" The tweet was written in Spanish, with the rough English translation, "Keep f***ing around and I'm gonna make you swallow your bitch words you f***ing whitey milks***tter (that's a homophobic slur). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Or stated another way “this court has no basis for declining jurisdiction”. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The case at issue – Moore v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Allen v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am
These directions derived from Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and Regina v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1 and the Supreme Court and Privy Council had to decide whether the common law had taken a wrong turning in these cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
Focusing on the state of English law during the long eighteenth century — that is to say, in the years before and just after Congress enacted the first copyright and patent statutes in 1790 — this Article demonstrates that although a domestic first-sale (or exhaustion) principle was evident in litigation in English courts, the common law did not recognize international exhaustion. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
Focusing on the state of English law during the long eighteenth century — that is to say, in the years before and just after Congress enacted the first copyright and patent statutes in 1790 — this Article demonstrates that although a domestic first-sale (or exhaustion) principle was evident in litigation in English courts, the common law did not recognize international exhaustion. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In J.C. and Others v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Safenames, an English company, was contractually responsible for pointing the fulltiltpoker.com domain name towards Pocket Kings' domain name servers. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Cf Bush v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
