Search for: "Early v. Rogers" Results 441 - 460 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In early 1996, Judge Jones invited briefing on expert witness challenges, and in face of the complex immunology and toxicology issues, and the emerging epidemiologic studies, he decided to appoint four technical advisors to assist him in deciding the challenges. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
  I'd like to think that our discussions were part of his early education, and not a bizarre form of child abuse!) [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Various new restrictions on voting, which range from more stringent identification requirements to fewer registration opportunities to curbs on early voting, have been put in place. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Like the trial court rulings, Chief Judge Roger Gregory’s opinion for the Fourth Circuit relies on the President Trump’s many campaign statements advocating a “Muslim ban,” as well as more recent statements by both the president and his advisers indicating that the first and second travel ban orders were outgrowths of this campaign agenda. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
  The Educators had agreed at an early stage of those proceedings to a survey methodology that resulted in evidence that by their later admission “needs to be collected differently” in light of the 2004  CCH v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Lucent's licensing expert, Roger Smith, argued for damages based solely on a running royalty rate. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]