Search for: "In Re David S. Et Al."
Results 441 - 460
of 635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Fox Television Stations, et al. (10-1293), but the protection from children from profanity and nudity considered harmful to them is directly at issue. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al., 2015 MBCA 44 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:53 pm
Ivan Frederick’s (ranking NCO, the one who’s uncle provided the pictures to CBS et al) defense was along the lines of “no one gave us rules or guidance! [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:35 pm
That constraint, however, does not require anyone to do what Stewart, Maddow, et al. are doing. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
In a paper with the amazing David Hoffman and Alessandro Acquisti, we’re building a database of breach lawsuits and performing some interesting docket analysis on these suits. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
App. 1993)(laryngeal cancer) In re W.R. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(IP Watchdog) US Patents Congress makes another attempt to ban tax strategy patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Poor man’s opposition (Anticipate This!) [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Nearly two decades ago David L. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Clark issued his decision Aug. 18, 2008. *** Cintas Corp. (4-CA-34160, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 81) Cincinnati, OH Jan. 30, 2009. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm
Allison et al., Valuable Patents, 92 Geo. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
We’re just regulating their conduct of publishing content,” as if those are different things. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:52 am
(c) Given that students have to get a minimum of a 2.2 (although, frankly, this is a certificate of incompetence) to get into a Legal Practice Course Farm these days - the chance of a student getting a training contract with a 2.2 from The University of Lakeside Thurrock and Bluewater et al is remote. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
”[14] A sustained discussion of digitization and children’s rights only emerged around 2014, as the CRC organized a Day of General Discussion on “Digital media and children’s rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York earlier in their careers. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(Builds on scholars such as Sean Seymore and Ben Roin; see also Krieger et al. on drug novelty. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
I have lots of company, David Pozen reminds me, in The Constitution of the War on Drugs, his prodigiously researched take down of said war but not said constitution. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
This phenomenon is known as confounding by indication, or as indication bias.6 Kaye and Freedman’s statistics chapter notes that confounding is a particularly important consideration when evaluating observational studies. [read post]
