Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 441 - 460 of 4,391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
On December 27, 2005, the proprietor requested that the opposition proceedings be stayed and that the case be remanded to the Examining Division (ED) for re-issuance of the granted patent after correction under R 89 EPC 1973. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:35 pm by Matthew Odgers
If you’re dealing with the probate process in the state of California, you can count yourself relatively lucky. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
By the time the company filed its amended 10-K, its share price had collapsed. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:52 am by slkimbro
The State Bar of California has released a draft formal ethics opinion (No. 10-0003) regarding the use of a “virtual law office practice” by an attorney. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am by Chris Wesner
Ohio Feb. 3, 2017) (questioning the exclusion of basic bankruptcy services from Upright Law’s fee agreements); In re Scharf, No. 17-01442-als7, 2018 WL 3863796 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The decisive factor here is when the person concerned ought to have noticed the error if he had taken all due care.The representative has conceded that he received the notification of the loss of rights pursuant to R 112(1) on 10 December 2008 […].Receipt of notification under R 112(1) is relevant to the question of when the cause of non-compliance with a time limit is removed. [read post]
When you have an objective basis for questioning the employee’s stated religious belief, you should request more information before deciding whether to grant the religious accommodation. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
The ballots were deleted automatically when the system was re-set for the election, although the audit log doesn't indicate that the system was ever re-set or that the test ballots were deleted. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Steve Davies
Newly-released studies are highly critical of the states’ wolf population estimates. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
The judicial exercise of independent judgment requires consideration of the culpability of the offenders at issue in light of their crimes and characteristics, along with the severity of the punishment in question…. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am by MBettman
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) (the prosecution must prove every element of a crime “beyond a reasonable doubt” for the defendant to be convicted.) [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Steven Cohn Carle Place, N.Y. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Surreal State of Legal Salaries in New York August 14, 2007 To the Editor, Without getting into the question of whether we have all fallen down the rabbit hole with respect to summer associate salaries, there can be no question that we have with regard to judicial compensation. [read post]