Search for: "Leah Litman" Results 441 - 460 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Will Baude
"Teaching constitutional law today is an enterprise in teaching students what law isn't," Leah Litman, a professor at the University of Michigan law school, told me. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman considers the cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman explains why this decision “is a virtual treasure trove for Court watchers. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman writes that Kelly v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
In the Michigan Law Review, Leah Litman looks at Gorsuch’s opinion in a case involving a post-conviction challenge to a criminal sentence, concluding that the “opinion overvalues proceduralism relative to substantive rights in a way that will have the effect of eroding litigants’ access to courts. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman and others push back against assertions by conservative commentators that “only a weak-willed, weak-kneed judge would ever deviate from right-wing orthodoxy to preserve the [Supreme C]ourt’s legitimacy,” arguing that “some issues really do strike at the court’s legitimacy,” and “[t]he challenge to the addition of a citizenship question on the 2020 Census is one of them. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman explains that several Supreme Court cases in October Term 2016, as well as several on the docket for the upcoming term, “raised questions about the worth of the government’s word—that is, what to make of the words that the government had used in previous litigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray and Leah Litman “recap the argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Leah Litman and Britany Riley argue that “[t]he administration’s position on the ‘solution’ to lengthy immigration detentions—go home— … illustrates how the structure of immigration law allows an aggressive executive branch to render meaningless the few protections that immigration law affords. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman and Abigail DeHart argue that “many of the Court’s recent decisions tell us what we need to know [about Trump v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by SHG
” Tribe joined law professor Leah Litman to eviscerate the “breathtaking scope” of the order. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman contends that if the court “is serious about the reasoning and principles it articulated in Masterpiece Cakeshop, and it should be, then it should reject several of the arguments that have been used [in Trump v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:25 am by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it very closely tracks the argument of an amicus brief that Sam Bagenstos, Marty Lederman, Leah Litman, and I filed in 2017 in the SCOTUS case of Gloucester County School Bd. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020).Leah LitmanMark Tushnet’s Taking Back the Constitution is a tour de force. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Va. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” In the Northwestern University Law Review Online, Leah Litman and Shakeer Rahman examine Beckles v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Or, as Professor Leah Litman explained, the Chief Justice’s complaint is “not about whether the regulation treats non-religious and religious institutions the same. [read post]