Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 441 - 460
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
Commentary on today’s travel-ban ruling comes from Dara Lind and Tara Golshan of Vox; Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress; Marty Lederman for Just Security; and Leah Litman of Take Care Blog. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Marty Lederman says: How about Congress "getting him the message," Senator Reid, by actually requiring him to act? [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 10:38 am
(Many thanks to Marty Lederman for alerting us to the recent developments and providing links to the filings.) [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:13 am
”) Marty Lederman does his usual lovely job at Balkinization of explaining why the equation of these practices as similar in their views of executive power is wrong. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 3:05 am
(The article includes quotes by Neal Katyal and Marty Lederman on issues closely related to the case). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” Marty Lederman argues at Just Security (cross-posted at Take Care) that “all of [the government’s] urgent briefing and pleas for expedition is rather beside the point, because by its own terms, the ‘entry ban’ expires less than two weeks from now. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
Marty Lederman says that I've missed the whole point: Kamehama Schools' Hawaiians-only policy is remedial. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
Marty Lederman says that I've missed the whole point: Kamehama Schools' Hawaiians-only policy is remedial. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief (discussed in the post by Marty Lederman, who is also on the brief) in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
[Update: see Marty Lederman's post speculating about the next case.] [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 1:30 pm
Marty Lederman, a former top Obama administration lawyer, attacks the memo for “conjuring from whole cloth a preposterously long set of assumptions” about Mueller’s investigation. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:48 pm
More information and sources are available from Marty Lederman and Andrew Hyman and Michael Ramsey. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am
In fact, as Marty Lederman has pointed out, the Supreme Court interpreted the draft exemption to cover all objectors precisely because limiting it to religious people would raise Establishment Clause concerns, according to the best and most common interpretation of its decision. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
I agree completely with what Professor Marty Lederman wrote in a thread on BlueSky: "The vast majority of what's in the report is not only uncontested but also was well-known to everyone, at least in broad detail, in February 2021. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
That question in turn raises sub-questions, as discussed thoughtfully along with discussion of many of the other issues by Professor Marty Lederman in a multi-part series on Balkinization, which also includes helpful recent contributions from Professors Bruce Ackerman, Mark Graber, and Gerard Magliocca.(9) Intertwined with some of the foregoing questions, does the case present a nonjusticiable political question? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
” As Marty Lederman's excellent posts here revealing the lack of burden on Hobby Lobby Executives religious exercise should establish, in order to find for Hobby Lobby the Court needs to adopt this broad view of RFRA's protections. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm
Despite this, Marty Lederman and the Times’ own Andrew Rosenthal and I all independently seemed to read the piece in much the same way – i.e. as suggesting that there was something comparable in Bush’s embrace of executive power and Obama’s, and that this might have something to do with national security. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At Just Security, Marty Lederman explains that he “would not be at all surprised if the Court does ‘vacate” the opinions,” but doesn’t “think anything of much practical significance turns on whether it does so or not. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, Nicholas Bagley in The New York Times, Robert Schlesinger at U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman comments on the oral argument and the case generally, asking whether it isn’t “at least somewhat troubling for Congress to prohibit members of the public from expressing something tomorrow that they were free to express yesterday? [read post]
