Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 3,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 8:44 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
State Street Ann Arbor, Michigan (MI) 48198 (Washtenaw County); The Law Office of Kurt T. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cicely Wilson
Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigration Rights, Unites States Supreme Court (4/22/14)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Education LawAfter the Supreme Court decided that the University of Michigan’s undergraduate admissions plan’s use of race-based preferences violated the Equal Protection Clause, but that its law school admission plan’s limited use did not, Michigan voters adopted a new section of the state constitution… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 4:34 am by admin
Consequently, due process protections under the Michigan and United States Constitutions … are operative. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:23 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that for more than forty years, the United States Forest Service (hereinafter Forest Service) has granted Plaintiff Hugh B. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Employment Services
On September 19, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Casias v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 8:06 am by Mary E. Ramos
Last Friday, the Supreme Court of the United States released their opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:05 pm by Heather Young
A class action lawsuit alleging that the Detroit Police Department (DPD) systematically abused and mistreated arrestees was filed on Tuesday, June 1, 2010 in the United States Federal Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
We explained in a recent amicus brief from Michigan that "Since 2011, [Tillman] has expressly eschewed opining on the scope of Section 3's 'Office . . . under the United States'-language. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:01 am by constitutional lawblogger
Even as we await the United States Supreme Court's opinion on the constitutionality of a university's affirmative action plan in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
The judgment below is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety." [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]