Search for: "Miles v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
“Nothing more is required to show that DAL purposefully directed its activities at the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A recent finding from a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of Texas is helpful. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Despite the recent announcement that Volkswagen had agreed to a $14.7 billion settlement with the United States arising out of allegations made by the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:28 am
Examples of unintended consequences and countervailing risks abound in environmental policy: MTBE, a fuel additive initially adopted to reduce tailpipe emissions and meet Clean Air Act requirements, is now one of the most pervasive groundwater contaminants in the United States; prompted by California's Proposition 65, Gillette removed TCE (a chemical listed as a "known carcinogen" by the State) from Liquid Paper only to substitute 1,1,1-trichloroethane… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:53 am by Joe Koncelik
The wells themselves are located over an area of approximately forty-three square miles at varying distances from the plant—from five hundred feet to eight miles away EPA said that Summit's plant, wells and flares worked together as a single unit that "together produced a single product. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:27 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial, stating that under Tennessee v. [read post]