Search for: "People v Holder"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
J. 131 (2013) in King v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision came Wednesday, in Suradi v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Simply put, California needs to lock up fewer people, as does our nation. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:40 pm
[Post by Venkat] Asis Internet Servs. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm
In Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:41 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court also denied the motion for stay in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 12:55 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear the LabCorp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 12:55 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear the LabCorp v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:51 am
So, having thought about the TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 3:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:09 pm
[Election Law Blog] * I guess some people at Harvard Law are going to try to organize a protest over Eric Holder’s commencement address. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:14 pm
In a decision published on December 12, 2011 in Judulang v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Wells discussed recent developments in Al Warafi v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:47 pm
In Century Surety Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
Also, the good people at the PTO should look at this case as a well-deserved pat on the back. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:53 am
Miquel MontañáIn Odiorne v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:10 am
That seems about as fair to me as allowing copyright holders to dictate which one-of-a-kind objects people are entitled to create, even when those objects have no plausible relationship to copyright holders’ economic interests. [read post]
