Search for: "People v Holmes"
Results 441 - 460
of 671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
The 6th Circuit ruling in USA v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:45 am
In Burlington v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:25 pm
For instance, in Schenck v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:06 pm
” Gitlow, 268 U.S. at 672 (Holmes, J., dissenting); see also Meyer v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.). [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:10 pm
Or she could be asked to discuss Bruce Ackerman's Holmes Lectures, which were reprinted in the Harvard Law Review. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
That's really a stupid slogan, since, as Holmes said, taxes are the price we pay for civilization (even if we recognize the possibility of taxes being excessive). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Holmes, III in Doe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
Didn't Oliver Wendell Holmes give it a big push with The Common Law in 1909 or so? [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 3:29 am
Funding of programs came from sources such as the Carnegie Institution, and the Rockefeller Foundation, As discussed in my book, The Indispensable Right,” Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld such sterilizations in his infamous Buck v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
This fixation on the Warren and Burger Courts is a symptom of a larger dis-ease: Whether you are a judge or an advocate, a bureaucrat or a legislative counsel, the place to begin your study of the modern Constitution is with the great decisions of a long line of Justices from Holmes to Scalia. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
In an interview with C-SPAN, Holmes Norton argued why standing up for the neutrality of speech was important during the civil rights era and why "sometimes I gotta defend people who would not defend me. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
Considering all of these cases together, the court seems posed to further promote a robust “free trade in ideas,” which was a theory first invoked in 1919 by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Abrams v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Lowry, 301 U.S. 242, and see Holmes, J., in Gitlow v. [read post]
