Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 9,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
I’d contrast my view, for example, with Toobin’s view of Chief Justice John Roberts in Citizens United. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court dismissed as improvidently granted two cases: United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Attorney Preet Bharara has filed a 53-page complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, United States of America v Carl Kruger, Richard Lipsky, Aaron Malinski, Solomon Kalish, Robert Aquino, David Rosen, William Boyland, Jr. and Michael Turano, alleging violations of 18 USC §§1341, 1343, 1346, 1349, and 1956(a)(1)(B) and (h).In a press release issued March 10, 2011, concerning the complaint, Governor… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm by Jason Mazzone
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:25 pm
Roberts engaged in a rare series of questions reflecting controlled frustration and disbelief at arguments from one of his former law clerks—representing the United States—that the State department did not have enough information to say what the court should do in the case Republic of Hungary v. [read post]