Search for: "SEC v. National Securities, Inc."
Results 441 - 460
of 491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
According to the indictment Stein and co-conspirators faked purchase orders from fictitious customers and then issued press releases and filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that reported the fictitious sales. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
Freeman, 43 Misc.2d 616, 251 N.Y.S.2d 996, affd. 24 A.D.2d 704, 262 N.Y.S.2d 431; National Psychological Assn. for Psychoanalysis, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm
Cleo, Inc., 995 S.W.2d 88 (Tenn. 1999); Wojtowicz v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
This settlement is part of the EPA's national effort to reduce air emissions from refineries. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Guest Post by Colleen V. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Court to rehear U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
SEC. 203. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The cases are Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Grenier, No. 06-4473 I"n a criminal case involving alleged securities fraud, dismissal of defendants' indictment on statute of limitations grounds is affirmed where: 1) the mailing and faxing of false statements to the SEC did not constitute two distinct crimes; and 2) for purposes of 18 U.S.C. section 1001, the date defendants' mailed submission was received by the SEC was irrelevant". [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
Okay, so here’s the next installment of Mandelman’s Monthly Museletter, which I’ve decided I post whenever there are a bunch of things going on that need to be put into proper perspective, but there’s just no way I can write individual articles on each because to do so presents a serious health risk. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
This Nation’s constitutional history does not tolerate that choice. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/S3P Sec'y of Labor v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
PAJ, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
Buono was a 5-4 case upholding the installation of a war-memorial cross in a national park. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:22 pm
In the Express Scripts, Inc. v. [read post]
