Search for: "STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 10:34 am
The lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Connecticut by the law firm of Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz P.C., based in White Plains, New York. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
"When you're California or New York across the table from an Amazon, it's a pretty big slice of the market," says Kevin Sullivan, commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
The District joined Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode… [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
New York – Ethics Panel Investigating de Blasio’s Nonprofit Is Said to Issue Broad Subpoena New York Times – William Rashbaum | Published: 10/5/2016 A state ethics panel investigating New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s political nonprofit organization has served a sweeping subpoena on City Hall seeking communications among the mayor, his aides, the nonprofit, its donors, and consulting firms that worked for… [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:46 am
Perhaps New Jersey will follow New York in this as more courts get involved in the question. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:20 pm
An excerpt:[In Brunet v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
While the Court of Appeals has yet to consider how marriages of same-sex couples performed outside this State should be treated in New York, see Beth R. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:52 am
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:25 am
New York, and Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm
[6] The United States and each of the following 34 states as amicus curiae in support of Oklahoma: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas,… [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:04 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Georgia man first to be executed following Baze v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
On October 16, 1916, Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the United States in Brooklyn, New York. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:30 am
" Wolters Kluwer Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:57 am
This case involves, at its core, a trademark dispute between Healix Infusion Therapy, a Texas company, and Helix Health, a New York company. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:41 am
” Though drivers for UberX don’t need a commercial driver’s license in Connecticut or New Jersey, the website is clear that “[i]n order to drive with Uber in New York City, you need a TLC (Taxi and Limousine Commission) License,” and that Connecticut and New Jersey Drivers “CANNOT pick up anywhere in New York State. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:18 am
MyinfoGuard, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire,… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Aug. 1, 1995) (the hospital “was a provider of services of which the [products] were an incidental part, rather than a ‘product seller’” under the Connecticut product liability statute).DelawareWe didn’t find any Delaware hospital strict liability cases (probably because Delaware does not recognize strict liability), however, claims for hospital implied warranty have been rejected, for similar sales/service reasons, in Spaeder v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am
Let’s say John Smith, a citizen of Connecticut, along with Jane Doe, a citizen of New Jersey, are co-members of Generic LLC, a New York limited liability company. [read post]
