Search for: "State v. Wilson" Results 441 - 460 of 3,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Derick Wilson, No. 112,009 (Shawnee)State appealKevin P. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:03 am
The Court released a unanimous, per curiam opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:22 pm by Jennifer Lynch
And last summer, all nine justices on the Supreme Court agreed with this premise in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:42 am
The KSC applied its recent decision in State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 11:00 pm
Nominated by one of our favourite Presidents: Ronald Wilson Reagan, Kennedy has had profound effect on Constitutional Law and life in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:20 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The relator, Wilson, a local government employee, alerted both federal and county and state officials to irregularities in performance. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
State of Indiana [see ILB entry here], Charles Wilson of the AP writes:The Indiana Supreme Court has upheld the death sentence for a mentally ill man convicted in the 1997 abduction, rape and slaying of a Franklin College student -- but with reservations. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:01 pm
A California state appeals court earlier rejected Ford's contention and upheld the award to Benetta Buell-Wilson. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
He therefore granted the husband permission to appeal.Commentary: As Lord Justice Wilson stated, speciously making themselves bankrupt is "a tactic now not uncommonly employed by some devious husbands intent upon obstructing the claims of their wives following divorce". [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:04 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Patty[Affirmed; Luckert; July 24, 2020]Prosecutorial error in closing argument (burden shifting)State v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
Lord Wilson stated in his judgment that stage one had been complied with, the oral explanation that the recall was a result of L’s mental health having deteriorated was sufficient to satisfy stage one of the process. [read post]