Search for: "State v. Mark T. Smith" Results 441 - 460 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
Smith were in the majority; Judge Mark Elde dissented. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Smith, in which the Court prohibited an after-the-fact referendum from interfering with a state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
This week marked 10 years since former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden exposed the mass surveillance practice employed by the UK and US. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am by LindaMBeale
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Guardian Australia has announced the launch of Ben Roberts-Smith v the media, a special 5-episode podcast series about the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]