Search for: "State v. Roth" Results 441 - 460 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm by Greg Herman-Giddens
The limitation on deferrals under Section 457(e)(15) concerning deferred compensation plans of state and local governments and tax-exempt organizations remains unchanged at $16,500. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am by Jan von Hein
Kieninger: Vedanta v Lungowe: A milestone for human rights litigation in English courts against domestic parent companies and their foreign subsidiary In Vedanta v Lungowe, a case involving serious health and environmental damage due to emissions into local rivers from a copper mine in Sambia, the UK Supreme Court has affirmed the jurisdiction of the English courts, in relation to both the English parent company and the subsidiary in Sambia. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
In 1993, the Swaps Monitor, an industry newsletter, reported that the derivatives market amounted to a total of US$24 trillion, representing approximately four times the size of America’s domestic product by that time. [3] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the… [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am by Rory Little
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Consider the following five examples: “When to Lose a Case and Win a Cause” (discussing Justice William Brennan’s Janus-like obscenity opinion in Roth v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
SB 540 (Roth), adds Article 10.10 (§ 65620 et seq) to the Government Code, relating to land use. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
One of the most high profile cases on the Supreme Court's docket for next term is Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Judge Roth, dissenting: No, it doesn't (though I agree that the nonprofit's constitutional arguments all fail). [read post]