Search for: "Stewart v. People"
Results 441 - 460
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
A v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
Judge Dennis dissented, joined by Judges King, Stewart, Graves, Higginson, and Douglas. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court explained in 1931 in Near v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
Bray v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
In Payne v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:40 am
It's for the people of Scotland. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm
” People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:49 am
Nichols v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
The relevant case is Bartnicki v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
Thus, when an eighteen year old bartender attempted to hold her employer liable for allowing her to consume alcohol on the business' property, the court held that the owner had immunity from liability since the underage woman's fault exceeded the twenty-five percent as a result of being intoxicated over the limit (Stewart v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
Thus, when an eighteen year old bartender attempted to hold her employer liable for allowing her to consume alcohol on the business' property, the court held that the owner had immunity from liability since the underage woman's fault exceeded the twenty-five percent as a result of being intoxicated over the limit (Stewart v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
Stewart v Seward (2007) 148 CA4th 1513. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
Darbyshire also referenced a 2006 California Court of Appeal decision (O'Grady v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm
FEC dissenters and Justices Stewart, Powell, and Douglas. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
