Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
Design patents in the modern era are seldom directed to fashionable carpet designs or classic Coca-Cola bottles; they are often sought, and issued, for relatively mundane design features. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:58 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am
” At this blog, Alan Horowitz analyzes last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Thursday: New York State Pistol & Rifle Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
See United States f/u/b/o Seminole Sheet Metal Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
The Court recalled its classic case law according to which Article 308 EC may be used as the legal basis for a measure only where no other provision of the EC Treaty gives the EU institutions the necessary power to adopt it (Case C-84/94 United Kingdom v Council [1996] ECR I-5755, paragraph 48 (working time directive case); Case C-22/96 Parliament v Council [1998] ECR I-3231, paragraph 22; and Case C-436/03 Parliament v Council [2006] ECR I-3733,… [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
As the change of gender and first name was acquired, the United Kingdom was also still a Member State. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm
It will not include most overseas applicants for refugee status, who do not fit under any of these rubrics and lack any previous ties to the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
The Court narrowed the doctrine in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
EFF and our clients disagree with this ruling, and we will be appealing it to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Here's one thing I know for sure: the United States has the power to -- and actively does -- imposes taxes on residents regardless of where they're located and regardless of whether that income is earned in other countries. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
McPherson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm
June 1, 2020), and the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
And in the United States, the statistics are that Apple has well over half of the smartphones. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
Not all states treat them as classic restraints of trade (probably because they aren't). [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
[1] FTC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Dupart v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
:@WilliamBaude: The Important Choice of Law Questions Lurking in Tomorrow's Stolen-Pissarro Argument
17 Jan 2022, 10:08 am
" This implicates a classic federal choice-of-law case, Klaxon v. [read post]
