Search for: "Vikram David Amar"
Results 441 - 460
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar discusses the Court’s summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit last week in the habeas case of Cavazos v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar maintains that “[t]his week’s decision by Justice Samuel Alito … to leave undisturbed the congressional districting ruling last month by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court … is a helpful reminder of the importance of state courts and state constitutions in safeguarding American democracy. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Also at Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the possible procedural defects in Fisher v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
My Verdict co-columnist Vikram David Amar recently addressed the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Burwell).In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) permits a closely held for-profit corporation to deny its employees the health coverage of contraceptives to which the employees are otherwise entitled by the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), based on the religious objections of the corporation’s owners.Here is some commentary tracking the progress of these cases before the Court’s… [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
In fact, some of these legal experts recommend a single term of 18 years for Supreme Court Justices, including Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar writing in Should U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage highlights “the major questions before the court this fall. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar explores “how the Justices have gotten to the point where neither wing of the Court seems remotely open to, or trustful of, the other on these matters,” while Esther J. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar concurs with other commentators who have suggested that Jeffrey Toobin’s behind-the-scenes account of Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Carvin of Jones Day; David C. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
” Additional commentary comes from Vikram David Amar and Alan Brownstein at Justia’s Verdict blog, who remark that “what may be most memorable and important in this opinion is not the analytic moves it makes, but the tone it employs and the message about respect, civility, and dignity it tries to send. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar discusses the court’s approach to precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
Akhil and Vikram Amar responded with an article making the case that legislative succession was unconstitutional. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar have put forward an Intermediate View: the elected President is an "officer of the United States," but members of Congress are not. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Given the difficulty of amending the Constitution, it will not likely be abolished any time soon.Accordingly, reformers have been seeking to circumvent the Electoral College without a constitutional amendment, based on an idea originally proposed by law professors including my fellow Verdict columnist Dean Vikram Amar. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Gibbons Addison, Note, A proposed wealth distribution system based on the underlying premise of revenue sharing in American pro sports, 89 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 1179 (2011) Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as regulator, litigant, and state actor, 52 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 415 (2011) Andrew D. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times Vikram Amar and Alan Brownstein argue that “[t]here is no intellectually honest basis for concluding that the individual mandate will create a steeper slope less susceptible to judicial or political handholds and footholds than those slopes that already exist under current and accepted doctrine. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
With the Obama-Romney election nearly upon us, my column today updates readers on the status of various presidential election reform efforts (a topic about which I have written columns for this site in the past). [read post]
