Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 441 - 460
of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2008, 4:55 am
We lay people don't know how to decide these things.I'm not sure judges do, either. ..more.. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm
And I certainly don't think he was the best judge on his own court. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:28 pm
We don't know how to file lawsuits. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
We don't reverse for inconsistent verdicts that do the same thing. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:17 am
His endorsement of those principles has always seemed opportunistic and I don't expect him to stand on them when they fly in the face of a Republican president's policies. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 3:28 pm
House Judiciary Committee Democrats say they analyzed the telecom spying documents they've sought for more than a year and have come to the conclusion the phone and internet companies don't deserve retroactive amnesty for charges they spied illegally on Americans. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:09 pm
Facing seemingly insurmountable odds, they don't blink. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
But these background facts don't give the judge the same human knowledge about the person that a face-to-face interaction does. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Supporters of secretive agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) argue that they don't require a change to U.S. law. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
That's understandable, don't you think? [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
We don't do such things because we are not animals. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:40 pm
Don't mingle with other people. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 7:36 am
And so, if people up in Amarillo and Potter county want to pay us a few million dollars extra for bed years that we're not going to use anyway, they want it, we don't. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
You don't think the judge is ever going to catch on? [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 10:46 am
I must say, that's a darn persuasive introduction.Here's how Judge Gould begins his response:"We confront in this case an unusual confluence of circumstances. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
Under our scheme, we don't admit that the process developed over centuries with the incremental approval of judge after judge is flawed. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm
We don’t know what else we could have said other than, perhaps, “and we really mean it. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
If you have enough metadata, you don’t really need content. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
[My Comment: Don't Booker (7th Cir.) and Ameline (9th Cir.) carry any weight here? [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:04 pm
And if those questions don't get lawyers thinking, they can expect a pop quiz before the day is done. [read post]
