Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 48,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 10:51 am
(v) The availability of the value-added product or service must be based on documented objective evidence and offered in a manner that is not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:46 am
Jefferson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:00 am
When the insurance company denied his claims, the employee filed a lawsuit in order to recoup those costs. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:27 pm
Council Action v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:19 pm
In the recent case of GEICO v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
On Monday, in Ramos v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:20 am
” Rynearson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:50 am
Pomeroy (Pacific Legal Foundation - Program for Judicial Awareness and Pacific Legal Foundation) have posted Desperately Seeking Scrutiny: Why the Supreme Court Should Use Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:24 pm
Confusion breeds consistency costs. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
”Whatever errors the district court may have made in evaluating the inputs for Professor Shapiro’s quantitative model, the model did not take into account long-term contracts, which would constrain Turner Broadcasting’s ability to raise content prices for distributors. . . .[7] The appellate court notes that the district court did not conduct a costs benefit analysis balancing “increased prices for… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
”Whatever errors the district court may have made in evaluating the inputs for Professor Shapiro’s quantitative model, the model did not take into account long-term contracts, which would constrain Turner Broadcasting’s ability to raise content prices for distributors. . . .[7] The appellate court notes that the district court did not conduct a costs benefit analysis balancing “increased prices for… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Thomas v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
It comes as no surprise that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
As the Supreme Court has noted, the polluter pays principle “has become firmly entrenched in environmental law in Canada”: Imperial Oil Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:36 pm
For example, in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:03 am
All 'reasonable costs' incurred by a medical provider in locating, copying, or making the records available may be charged to the requesting party, subject to limits set forth in the statute, which include $0.10 per page for reproducing documents measuring up to 8.5 by 14 inches, $0.20 per page for producing documents from microfilm, and clerical costs not to exceed $16 per hour per person for locating and making records available. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:11 am
Morgan Stanley also had no implied duty under applicable New York law to charge a fee that was reasonably proportionate to actual costs where it notified customers in advance of the charges and customers were free to decide whether to continue to do business with Morgan Stanley.Appert v. [read post]
