Search for: "People v Long"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 18,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 5:28 pm
This move came in light of the Court’s recent decision in People v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
Basically, a citizen gets to slam the door on the police (as long as you don't hit the police with the door). [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster was a Detroit police officer with a long history of mental illness who killed his girlfriend. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
After all, in the wake of the Civil War the people who were most determined to assert legal continuity were former Confederates, not radical Republicans. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:41 am
North Carolina has long had a statute on habitual shoplifting. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am
In an earlier post I quoted Justice Sotomayor’s statement (concurring in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
Accts. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am
It’s 2021, long past the time consumers have come to understand competitive keyword advertising, and yet a bar regulator issues an evidence-free and inappropriately brief opinion that competitive keyword ads deceive prospective clients. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
On the moment the news broke about Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Trump v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Perry undoubtedly still has a long way to go in the US courts, as does Zappone & Gilligan here in Ireland, but both cases are fundamentally about forcing the state to justify its decision to exclude same-sex couples from marriage. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:12 am
For a long time, the response of our criminal justice system to that statistic was to lock more people up for longer periods. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Bakers Lose in Oregon Case, But Wedding Singers / Painters / Photographers Might Win
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am
Today's Klein v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
Jacox also noticed other people that he believed were watching him. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:51 am
Leach v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The problem is, a long line of Supreme Court cases says that the government can’t ban religious people from getting public benefits simply because they are religious. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
