Search for: "Banks v. US" Results 4601 - 4620 of 14,530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm by Inside Privacy
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:25 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:34 am by Beth Graham
 Allen Stanford created a massive Ponzi scheme using a large network of interconnected companies and a bank that were collectively known as the Stanford Group. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:58 am by Patrick T. Ryan
Comenity Bank, 842 F.3d 181 (2d Cir. 2016) (two of the alleged Truth In Lending Act violations involved concrete injuries and thus sufficed for standing; two other alleged violations did not); Braitberg v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 10:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Moreover, debtors pursing PPP projects should use Title III proceedings to improve the legal certainty around such projects, including possibly obtaining orders that confirm the legal status of the revenues that will be used in such projects, or by requiring the debtor to reject burdensome contracts that could not otherwise be consensually renegotiated and that otherwise might chill interest from potential PPP sponsors. [read post]