Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 4601 - 4620
of 23,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
As sordid as all of that is, it pales compared to how the World War II justices dealt with the President of the United States.The most important and notorious case during the War was Korematsu v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 5:27 am
Justice Ginsburg used her position to continue the fight for women’s rights, upholding the Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Twenty years ago, the ACLU brought a landmark case, Sheff v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg reports that “the justices today sought to draw a line that would both prevent the smuggling of weapons and drugs and protect the privacy interests of people arrested for minor violations. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm
The chief justice is next with the opinion in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:28 pm
Eric VanDussen asked the Court of Appeals to permit him to videotape oral argument in People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
This announcement caught many people’s attention. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
On 12 December 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment on the assessment of damages in three actions by Matthew Cooper and Imaginatik plc (“the Company”) against Mark Turrell ([2011] EWHC 3269 (QB)). [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:58 pm
Ellis and State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
(Insurance Coverage) People In Interest of E.A.M. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:36 am
(People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
(People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:43 am
The big cell-phone privacy case, Carpenter v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:01 pm
All can be heard in New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew Cooper’s May 18, 2020 decision in Chu v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
It impacts upon the way you are treated by the criminal justice system (in particular in relation to sentencing), and upon the way you are treated by society at large. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:02 pm
In the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:38 am
Bret Stephens wonders why he and fellow journalists ignored the fact that “[a]lmost from the beginning, there was something amiss in the case of People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:13 pm
Justice Morgan adequately addressed many of these contemporary issues in this decision, stating, [36] In its landmark decision in R. v. [read post]
