Search for: "Plaintiffs Lead Counsel" Results 4601 - 4620 of 6,281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm by Bruce Carton
Is plaintiffs counsel feeling a fellow lawyer's pain and letting Burkhalter off the hook here, you might ask? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by emagraken
 This leads to a built-in conflict of interest. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm by Lara
What could lead twelve citizens of South Carolina to award 28X more damages against the indirect infringer than the direct infringer? [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm by Michael C. Smith
  He inquired into the plaintiff's trial strategy, and learned that the plaintiff's strategy was to settle with most defendants for a small fraction of its reasonable royalty damage analysis at trial - sums which were substantially the same as the cost to get the case to the Markman hearing. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:33 pm by S2KM Limited
Of special interest to structured settlement and settlement planning professionals, Barrett highlighted and discussed the questions plaintiff attorneys are most likely to ask about health care reform. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:44 am by Maxwell Kennerly
They found, intriguingly, that starting children on structured education too soon causes all sorts of problems, leading to shorter lifespans. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:17 pm by Howard Knopf
Both documents were executed on behalf of these parties by Jon Foreman, who I assume is the same Jonathan Foreman who is one of the lead class action counsel. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This would lead to a lot more foods being included. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:59 pm by Ari Ezra Waldman
The Sixth Amendment guarantees to accused the right to be informed of the nature and cause accusations against him, to call witnesses in his favor, to have the assistance of counsel and to confront his accuser. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:31 pm by David Walk
There must be a page in the plaintiffs’ manual directing counsel to try in every single case to use Dr. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
      the corporate litigation bar—both plaintiffs’ and defense counsel—is very much aware of the recent rulings and statements of the Court expressing, in certain circumstances, dissatisfaction with settlements and the processes leading to those settlements. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As the Brief reasoned:   Special Counsel does not believe that the facts here lead to a conclusion that the settlement in this case was collusive. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:06 am by Ashby Jones
Briefings by the plaintiffs and defendants are due on March 21 and March 28, respectively. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:56 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Collusion After a review of the leading commentary by scholars as well as court decisions from around the country, the Special Counsel formulated the following definition: a collusive settlement in the context of stockholder deal litigation appears to involve, at its core, an explicit or implicit agreement between counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendants to require less consideration for the settling class in exchange for (1) exclusive dealings… [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:33 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
A long list of exemplary “proper purposes” under Section 220 was quoted from a leading treatise on Delaware corporate law. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:32 pm by Fernando M. Pinguelo
So far, according to the law firm of Lieff Cabrasser Heimann & Bernstein, which is serving as lead counsel for the class, the court has now given preliminary approval of partial class settlements from two of the foreign companies for a combined $17 million. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 7:35 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Most egregiously, Barclays actively concealed the pairing from the Del Monte Board…Barclays continued to hide its involvement and recommended that the pairing be permitted. **** Barclays similarly crossed the line with its late-stage request for permission to be one of KKR’s lead banks. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm by TDot
Saturday (03/05/11): And with that confidence in-hand, we torched the next two teams we faced on Saturday Tinkerbell and I were counsel for the Plaintiff for both rounds, and we first went up against 2Ls from I’m-not-entirely-sure-where.3 The results could be summed up like this: Tinkerbell was so devastating on cross-examination, their lead counsel blurted “DAMN! [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:45 am by Mark Herrmann
(In fact, after we won the motion and submitted a proposed order in this case, plaintiff’s counsel objected to our use of the word “slit” in the proposed order granting summary judgment. [read post]