Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 6,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am
” Regulation of information as it moves over international borders: a lot at stake. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 1:00 pm
The law struck down in Larson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:28 am
Our damages are primarily compensatory (although the CJEU in January's decision OTK v SFP (Case-367/15) has another view). [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Meanwhile in the UK the ISPs’ appeal to the Court of Appeal in Cartier v BSkyB (three judgments here, here and here) is pending. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
What this probably means for the foreseeable future is that we will be locked into deeply polarizing battles over border policy and the resources available to the children of unauthorized migrants as proxy fights over belonging. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am
Overbroad Scope of Evidence Gathering Powers Will Enable Domestic and Cross-Border Spying on Acts of Expression: The open-ended scope of Chapters IV & V risks undermining law enforcement cooperation on actual cybercrime offenses by diluting resources. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 pm
L. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 8:04 am
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
In 86 percent of cases, all parties were based in the same EU member state and there are only a few instances in the data set of trade secret litigation with truly cross-border dimensions. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 7:48 am
• Global Crises at BordersFocuses on how migration, climate displacement, and pandemics challenge legalframeworks at national borders. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:43 pm
Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
There are diverging views in this respect, as seen recently in the Responses to the Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Copyright Rules (see hereat Section V). [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am
Examples include (i) a registered marijuana dispensary selling non-marijuana infused baked goods to protect its brand name for edible marijuana products; (ii) registering a service mark for providing consulting and/or educational services to the marijuana industry (the services themselves are not illegal and, therefore, permitted to be registered); (iii) clothing items such as hats, t-shirts, and hoodies; (iv) stickers and pins; and (v) accessories such as pipes, e-pens, or vaporizers. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 5:42 pm
To this end, we call on them to promote an ambitious and effective directive that prevents and puts an end to the impunity of many companies.We, the undersigned, ask that a number of fundamental issues be appropriately addressed to ensure that the text effectively fulfills the purpose for which it was conceived; as well as its consistency with the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council more than ten years ago) and with other international… [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
The four-part test for determining inherent distinctiveness of trade dress was set forth in Seabrook v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:36 pm
First up, the death of the "inevitable disclosure" doctrine based on Pepsico v Redmond, 54 F.3d 1262 (7th Cir 1995) which assumed that any departing employee potentially carried knowledge acquired in their employment and could therefore be subject to an injunction. [read post]
