Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 4621 - 4640 of 48,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2020, 6:44 am by Charlotte Howells
Last month, we discussed a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Lawson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:44 am by Charlotte Howells
Last month, we discussed a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Lawson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:44 am by Charlotte Howells
Last month, we discussed a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Lawson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:11 am by INFORRM
  The Claimant’s Estimate of base costs to the conclusion of the action was £506,331.81 as against the Defendant’s base costs estimate of £91,172. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:53 am
 By Robert Milligan and summer associate Andrew Larratt-Smith In a decision that encourages cost efficient corporate mergers in Nevada, the Nevada Supreme Court in HD Supply Facilities Maintenance v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:11 am
Under a deed of indemnity, Travelers agreed to indemnify Aon against any loss, liability, claim or cost arising from Minet's conduct occurring on or before the date of sale. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:09 pm
  The Court of Appeal says that the cost-shifting provisions of CCP 998 don't apply to the one-way fee and cost-shifting provisions of the Labor Code. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
As a result of the enormous costs incurred on the client’s claim and the modest settlement in her favour, there was an intractable conflict of interest and duty on RPC once the opponent defaulted. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The ISB has agreed to drop any enforcement of a costs order made against him. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:16 pm by Simon Gibbs
Following in the wake of Lord Justice Jackson’s comments in Pankhurst v White [2010] EWCA Civ 1445 concerning “grotesque” funding arrangements, legal expenses insurer DAS has decided this represents a good opportunity to attack Jackson’s costs proposals. [read post]