Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 4621 - 4640 of 22,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Whether the prohibition on unfair and deceptive practices in WCPA protects against price gouging is a question of first impression that originally came before Judge Lasnik in the United States District Court in the Western District of Washington. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:54 am by Cinthia Macie
Facebook, Inc., available at: gov.uscourts.dcd.224921.73.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) & Opinion in State of New York et. al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm by Lauren Connell
Thank you, Supreme Court of the United States, for resolving this very public controversy. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rachel Sachs
Jackson filed her brief  in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that heard oral argument yesterday in Americans United For Separation of Church and State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  But the court also noted that “it appears nothing prevents the United States from doing so as the Pueblo’s trustee. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  But the court also noted that “it appears nothing prevents the United States from doing so as the Pueblo’s trustee. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
United States and Barber v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
1-22-2010 National:Should courts adopt a new set of Fourth Amendment rules to regulate how the police can search computers for evidence? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Michael O'Hear
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]